Tuesday, June 25, 2019
Just a Thought: Boarder Crisis and Destroying America
Just a Thought: Boarder Crisis and Destroying America: The script almost writes itself. You get a bunch of Politicians who want nothing more than to cling to power, create a crisis and use ...
Boarder Crisis and Destroying America
The script almost writes itself. You get a bunch of Politicians who want nothing more than to cling to power, create a crisis and use it to it's full potential. You hear stories of babies starving at the boarder, and going without toothbrushes and showers and so on. It is a load of shit. They are selling you a News Story. A story that keeps the Media relevant with lies attached. Facts: 1) Does the U.S. use “cages” to detain children?
The government has rejected the idea that it uses “cages” in its facilities. But that’s the term used by activists and others who oppose the administration’s immigration policy. Also, news organizations have used that term, including the Associated Press, which used the word to refer to the fencing enclosures at one Texas facility.
2)So what about that image of a young boy in a cage?
The photo in question depicts a boy in distress as he looks out of a cage he is grasping with his hands. It has been turned into a meme that asks, “Are you Trump fans really OK with this?”Journalist and activist Jose Antonio Vargas included the photo in a June 11 tweet that said: “This is what happens when a government believes people are ‘illegal.’ Kids in cages.” (Vargas openly discusses his own status as an immigrant living in the country illegally.)In a subsequent tweet, Vargas acknowledged he wasn’t sure where the photo originated, but many others also shared the image, including the actor Ron Perlman.
3)Is the government using military camps to hold the minors?
Health and Human Services is indeed eyeing several military bases “for potential use as temporary shelters for unaccompanied alien children at some point in the future,” the Administration for Children and Families confirmed for us. On June 13, McClatchy reported that Fort Bliss in Texas could be used as a “tent city to hold between 1,000 and 5,000 children.”In addition to Fort Bliss, officials are evaluating Dyess Air Force Base and Goodfellow Air Force Base, which are also in Texas.If that happens, it wouldn’t be the first time military bases were used to accommodate immigrants. Under the Obama administration, bases served as such facilities, including in 2014 during the influx of unaccompanied children illegally entering the country.In his testimony last month, Wagner said the last “temporary” facility at a Department of Defense site closed in February 2017.
You can find these facts at Fact Check or by doing any kind of research on the subject.
You want to see hypocrisy then explain this: The Secure Fence Act of 2006
The Secure Fence Act of 2006, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, authorized about 700 miles of fencing along certain stretches of land between the border of the United States and Mexico. The act also authorized the use of more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting to curb illegal immigration, and the use of advanced technology such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles. At the time the act was being considered, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Chuck Schumer were all members of the Senate. (Schumer of New York is now the Senate minority leader.)Obama, Clinton, Schumer, and 23 other Democratic senators voted in favor of the act when it passed in the Senate by a vote of 80 to 19.
For a Democrat, Obama took a fairly tough stance, particularly early in his presidency, toward undocumented immigrants. In March 2014, Janet Murguía, president of the National Council on La Raza, a Latino advocacy group, called Obama "the deporter-in-chief."
It was a criticism that activists leveled at Obama throughout his presidency. From 2009 to 2016, his administration oversaw the forcible removal of more than 3 million undocumented immigrants—most of whom were sent back to Mexico. Neither Bill Clinton nor George W. Bush, Obama's two predecessors, came close to reaching his tally over their two terms.
Obama's immigration policies softened with time as Latino activists increasingly put pressure on his administration. In 2013, forcible removals peaked at 434,015 people, a figure unrivaled by Bush or Clinton. By 2016, this had fallen to 344,354 immigrants, slightly lower than Bush's peak of 359,795 in 2008.
If you read between the lines you will see the narrative, it is all about Votes and pandering, redistricting, and political power. At one time Democrats had a much harder stance on Illegal Immigration than Republicans. Go back and watch President Clinton Speeches and President Obama Speeches on the subject. Hell, do not take my word for it. You can find these speeches on any search.
All the great Nations at one time had good Governments but in the long run, had become too large and then pander to outsiders to fix the money problems they themselves have created. They have all fallen. Learning the lessons from History is no brainier. This country will not and cannot sustain a policy of open borders. We are a Nation of Laws, unless otherwise changed we will continue to be a Nation of Laws. At this point you have to make a choice, you either uphold the Laws of this Nation, or you just suspend all of them and brace for the outcome. I can bet that when this problem starts to affect the ones complaining loudly about abuses that do not exist, then in turn those very people start losing their jobs to lesser skilled labor the outcry will turn on a dime to "Why has the Government allowed this to happen?". Immigration reform is a must job for this country. We cannot take in the whole world. it is statistically impossible no matter what hypothetical math you use. We have to put away the claws and set aside political differences and also set aside the political pandering and find a solution on a problem that will break this country in the long run. And listening to these political liars running for President it would seem to me that is going to be impossible. You have to take away their incentive to drive asinine narratives. Just fix the problem fairly.
The government has rejected the idea that it uses “cages” in its facilities. But that’s the term used by activists and others who oppose the administration’s immigration policy. Also, news organizations have used that term, including the Associated Press, which used the word to refer to the fencing enclosures at one Texas facility.
2)So what about that image of a young boy in a cage?
The photo in question depicts a boy in distress as he looks out of a cage he is grasping with his hands. It has been turned into a meme that asks, “Are you Trump fans really OK with this?”Journalist and activist Jose Antonio Vargas included the photo in a June 11 tweet that said: “This is what happens when a government believes people are ‘illegal.’ Kids in cages.” (Vargas openly discusses his own status as an immigrant living in the country illegally.)In a subsequent tweet, Vargas acknowledged he wasn’t sure where the photo originated, but many others also shared the image, including the actor Ron Perlman.
3)Is the government using military camps to hold the minors?
Health and Human Services is indeed eyeing several military bases “for potential use as temporary shelters for unaccompanied alien children at some point in the future,” the Administration for Children and Families confirmed for us. On June 13, McClatchy reported that Fort Bliss in Texas could be used as a “tent city to hold between 1,000 and 5,000 children.”In addition to Fort Bliss, officials are evaluating Dyess Air Force Base and Goodfellow Air Force Base, which are also in Texas.If that happens, it wouldn’t be the first time military bases were used to accommodate immigrants. Under the Obama administration, bases served as such facilities, including in 2014 during the influx of unaccompanied children illegally entering the country.In his testimony last month, Wagner said the last “temporary” facility at a Department of Defense site closed in February 2017.
You can find these facts at Fact Check or by doing any kind of research on the subject.
You want to see hypocrisy then explain this: The Secure Fence Act of 2006
The Secure Fence Act of 2006, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, authorized about 700 miles of fencing along certain stretches of land between the border of the United States and Mexico. The act also authorized the use of more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting to curb illegal immigration, and the use of advanced technology such as satellites and unmanned aerial vehicles. At the time the act was being considered, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Chuck Schumer were all members of the Senate. (Schumer of New York is now the Senate minority leader.)Obama, Clinton, Schumer, and 23 other Democratic senators voted in favor of the act when it passed in the Senate by a vote of 80 to 19.
For a Democrat, Obama took a fairly tough stance, particularly early in his presidency, toward undocumented immigrants. In March 2014, Janet Murguía, president of the National Council on La Raza, a Latino advocacy group, called Obama "the deporter-in-chief."
It was a criticism that activists leveled at Obama throughout his presidency. From 2009 to 2016, his administration oversaw the forcible removal of more than 3 million undocumented immigrants—most of whom were sent back to Mexico. Neither Bill Clinton nor George W. Bush, Obama's two predecessors, came close to reaching his tally over their two terms.
Obama's immigration policies softened with time as Latino activists increasingly put pressure on his administration. In 2013, forcible removals peaked at 434,015 people, a figure unrivaled by Bush or Clinton. By 2016, this had fallen to 344,354 immigrants, slightly lower than Bush's peak of 359,795 in 2008.
If you read between the lines you will see the narrative, it is all about Votes and pandering, redistricting, and political power. At one time Democrats had a much harder stance on Illegal Immigration than Republicans. Go back and watch President Clinton Speeches and President Obama Speeches on the subject. Hell, do not take my word for it. You can find these speeches on any search.
All the great Nations at one time had good Governments but in the long run, had become too large and then pander to outsiders to fix the money problems they themselves have created. They have all fallen. Learning the lessons from History is no brainier. This country will not and cannot sustain a policy of open borders. We are a Nation of Laws, unless otherwise changed we will continue to be a Nation of Laws. At this point you have to make a choice, you either uphold the Laws of this Nation, or you just suspend all of them and brace for the outcome. I can bet that when this problem starts to affect the ones complaining loudly about abuses that do not exist, then in turn those very people start losing their jobs to lesser skilled labor the outcry will turn on a dime to "Why has the Government allowed this to happen?". Immigration reform is a must job for this country. We cannot take in the whole world. it is statistically impossible no matter what hypothetical math you use. We have to put away the claws and set aside political differences and also set aside the political pandering and find a solution on a problem that will break this country in the long run. And listening to these political liars running for President it would seem to me that is going to be impossible. You have to take away their incentive to drive asinine narratives. Just fix the problem fairly.
Tuesday, June 18, 2019
Just a Thought: Main Stream Media
Just a Thought: Main Stream Media: Main Stream Media. Hell that is a contradiction in terms. If you are seeing what is going on truthfully you could compare the Main Amer...
Main Stream Media
Main Stream Media. Hell that is a contradiction in terms. If you are seeing what is going on truthfully you could compare the Main American Media Companies to Pravda the Main News outlet in Russia. If you see what Pravda does there you will see what the American Media is doing here. They pick and choose a narrative and blow it right out the old ass. If you listen to these gas bags you would think America has fallen to the bottom of the World rankings. But on the contrary, America is stronger today than ever before. We have someone in office that is sticking it to other countries instead of other countries sticking it to us. The Unemployment number is off the charts low. There are now 160 million people working in the U.S. that is a number unheard of. Someone has finally stood up to other countries and now those very countries are starting to pay their fare share. But if you just watched CNN (Crappy News Network) or MSNBC or ABC, NBC, CBS, you would think he just declared war on the world. They, the media are in it for the money. The ratings. And last but not least the Power. They want to show the world they can change the direction of any country with their lies and continued harassment. Hey wait! That is what Russian TV (RT) and Pravda does. Hmm I wonder who is working for who. (Russian Collusion?)
Saturday, June 1, 2019
What have we become?
What have we become in America. First off we have become a nations that accepts just asinine ideas because they seem "WOKE" what ever the hell that means. That in itself is a lazy way of explaining anything now days. Have we become so lazy that we have to make up new meanings to words to somehow make ourselves feel smarter? When we speak in this manner we just seem somewhat dumber.
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Just a Thought: Common Sense on China Trade
Just a Thought: Common Sense on China Trade: Well let's see. Back in the 90's when Clinton pushed for the Chinese to enter the WTO "World Trade Organization" Ch...
Common Sense on China Trade
Well let's see. Back in the 90's when Clinton pushed for the Chinese to enter the WTO "World Trade Organization" China had a plan. That plan was to become the largest economy in the World. So they enter the agreement and then broke most, if not all the rules, stole intellectual property of major companies, even to the extent of stealing from our Government secret military plans and up coming equipment. All of this was done under Globalist Administrations that just turned the other cheek. All while the Chinese just kept collecting our money stealing our property and manipulating their own currency. They build all of our electronics that we use on a daily basis and no one is even concerned about that. Hmmm. Seems like that would set off a red flag. They even go so far as to come to the U.S. buy raw materials such as wood, go off the coast just far enough to enter International waters, then build products and run them right back and sell them to this country. What do you think they do with the waste? Hmm. Seems like we should know that.
The people in charge of our Country have let us down in ways that should be considered criminal. They have for years stood back and watched a country "China" steal and Con us into closing plants in this country robbing the American people from good paying jobs and self support. I am a firm believer in International trade. That is legal trade where all things are equal and fair. What I am not for is allowing Countries to continue to steal our Tax Money at the behest of dumb ass Politicians. China's one goal is to take over the world. It is a lofty goal but they are on their way to doing just that. Listen to the Media fan the flames of fear that every thing will now cost more. Hmm. I wonder if that would happen if we had good gate keepers that could have stopped all of this before it happened. Trump is right to stand up to the Chinese. The rest of these Socialist Idiots running for President have been the cause and will be the ones to finish off the Job of destroying our Economy.
WE NEED TO BUILD MORE IN OUR COUNTRY AND STOP OUTSOURCING ALL OF OUR MAJOR PRODUCTS. RIGHT APPLE!
Fact: You want to know why it is cheaper to do these things in China? Cheap Communist Slave Labor, No Environmental Control, and so on. Research it for yourself.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)